slyzr
Full Member
Posts: 124
|
Post by slyzr on Sept 30, 2022 11:18:58 GMT -8
Not really into the Jesus died for us to not be thingy. No greator love has one then dying for everyone else not to be? some of you guys are into the perputual, never to be ........ But be re-converted. are you one of those guy's? Do you mean one of those sweet warm wonderful guys who loves the Lord? Yeah that's me! How could you tell? Could it be you have the gift of discernment? No more like, do you think Jesus died for no one to be? |
|
|
|
Post by Theophilus on Oct 1, 2022 13:24:58 GMT -8
Do you mean one of those sweet warm wonderful guys who loves the Lord? Yeah that's me! How could you tell? Could it be you have the gift of discernment? No more like, do you think Jesus died for no one to be? Now you want me to think? No can do... I Can't Go for that. Jesus dying on the cross is a very serious matter which I'd be happy to discuss. Even with civics explanation of slyzr speak I honestly do not have a clue as to what you're talking about. |
|
slyzr
Full Member
Posts: 124
|
Post by slyzr on Oct 1, 2022 13:53:19 GMT -8
No more like, do you think Jesus died for no one to be? Now you want me to think? No can do... I Can't Go for that. Jesus dying on the cross is a very serious matter which I'd be happy to discuss. Even with civics explanation of slyzr speak I honestly do not have a clue as to what you're talking about. I don't care if you think or not. But I do not like the whips.
If you are not thinking, to apply whips ....... We have a huge issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Theophilus on Oct 1, 2022 14:09:51 GMT -8
Now you want me to think? No can do... I Can't Go for that. Jesus dying on the cross is a very serious matter which I'd be happy to discuss. Even with civics explanation of slyzr speak I honestly do not have a clue as to what you're talking about. I don't care if you think or not. But I do not like the whips.
If you are not thinking, to apply whips ....... We have a huge issue. If you don't care if I think or not why did you ask me if I think. And now you want to bring whips into the conversation. I realize this started out on a weird note but it seems to be getting weirder and weirder what with huge issues and whips and all. I say we go back to not being. All that being stuff...Well it's just not cracked up to what it's meant to be. Well it is sort of a crank up, but I think I'm over it. |
|
slyzr
Full Member
Posts: 124
|
Post by slyzr on Oct 1, 2022 15:51:39 GMT -8
I don't care if you think or not. But I do not like the whips.
If you are not thinking, to apply whips ....... We have a huge issue. If you don't care if I think or not why did you ask me if I think. And now you want to bring whips into the conversation. I realize this started out on a weird note but it seems to be getting weirder and weirder what with huge issues and whips and all. I say we go back to not being. All that being stuff...Well it's just not cracked up to what it's meant to be. Well it is sort of a crank up, but I think I'm over it. Look you are either into not thinking or not. |
|
|
|
Post by Theophilus on Oct 1, 2022 17:17:32 GMT -8
If you don't care if I think or not why did you ask me if I think. And now you want to bring whips into the conversation. I realize this started out on a weird note but it seems to be getting weirder and weirder what with huge issues and whips and all. I say we go back to not being. All that being stuff...Well it's just not cracked up to what it's meant to be. Well it is sort of a crank up, but I think I'm over it. Look you are either into not thinking or not. That's right and don't you forget it. I was into it at one time then I forgot what I was thinking about. |
|
slyzr
Full Member
Posts: 124
|
Post by slyzr on Oct 1, 2022 17:23:59 GMT -8
Look you are either into not thinking or not. That's right and don't you forget it. I was into it at one time then I forgot what I was thinking about. So you like the something else thinking for you? |
|
|
|
Post by Theophilus on Oct 1, 2022 17:43:24 GMT -8
That's right and don't you forget it. I was into it at one time then I forgot what I was thinking about. So you like the something else thinking for you? You mean like artificial intelligence? I guess I could use that until I get my brain transplant approved. Here let me ask this wall and see what it thinks. Wall seems to be remaining silent on this matter. |
|
slyzr
Full Member
Posts: 124
|
Post by slyzr on Oct 1, 2022 17:54:50 GMT -8
So you like the something else thinking for you? You mean like artificial intelligence? I guess I could use that until I get my brain transplant approved. Here let me ask this wall and see what it thinks. Wall seems to be remaining silent on this matter. Great ...... Congratulations. |
|
|
|
Post by Theophilus on Oct 2, 2022 9:21:28 GMT -8
You mean like artificial intelligence? I guess I could use that until I get my brain transplant approved. Here let me ask this wall and see what it thinks. Wall seems to be remaining silent on this matter. Great ...... Congratulations. Thank you, thank you very much. |
|
genez
Full Member
Posts: 130
|
Post by genez on Oct 3, 2022 16:56:54 GMT -8
The only way to expose the carnal believer is by means of the Law...
Not concerning the ceremonial law. But, for the moral, civil, and national law.
"But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law." Galatians 5:18
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2022 7:51:13 GMT -8
I have a question for the dozen or so posters in this thread (and any who participate hereafter). I ask this question because correctly understanding the answer to this question leads to a correct understanding of the law as a Christian and unity among the posters in the thread. Likewise, not correctly understanding the answer to the question invariably leads to an incorrect understanding of the law as a Christian and that will, in turn, lead to division among those in the thread. The question can, and should, be answered in one to three words. ("X" or "X and Y"). The responses doing so will be much appreciated. Let me encourage everyone to read the relevant epistolary texts (Romans 3; Galatians 2-5; James 1) before answering because the answer to the above question is plainly stated. It is not a matter of interpretation.
What is the stated context of Paul's (and James') commentary on the law?
.
|
|
|
|
Post by civic on Oct 9, 2022 5:04:49 GMT -8
I have a question for the dozen or so posters in this thread (and any who participate hereafter). I ask this question because correctly understanding the answer to this question leads to a correct understanding of the law as a Christian and unity among the posters in the thread. Likewise, not correctly understanding the answer to the question invariably leads to an incorrect understanding of the law as a Christian and that will, in turn, lead to division among those in the thread. The question can, and should, be answered in one to three words. (" X" or " X and Y"). The responses doing so will be much appreciated. Let me encourage everyone to read the relevant epistolary texts (Romans 3; Galatians 2-5; James 1) before answering because the answer to the above question is plainly stated. It is not a matter of interpretation. What is the stated context of Paul's (and James') commentary on the law? . Galatians 3:1-14 You foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified? 2 This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? 3 Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh? 4 Did you suffer so many things in vain — if indeed it was in vain? 5 So then, does He who provides you with the Spirit and works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? 6 Even so Abraham BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS RECKONED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS. 7 Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham. 8 The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, "ALL THE NATIONS WILL BE BLESSED IN YOU." 9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer. 10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO DOES NOT ABIDE BY ALL THINGS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF THE LAW, TO PERFORM THEM." 11 Now that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, "THE RIGHTEOUS MAN SHALL LIVE BY FAITH." 12 However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, "HE WHO PRACTICES THEM SHALL LIVE BY THEM." 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us — for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE" — 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. Galatians 3:21-27 For if a law had been given which was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law. 22 But the Scripture has shut up everyone under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. 24 Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. 26 For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. Romans 3:19-20 19 Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; 20 because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin. Galatians 2:15-17 15 "We are Jews by nature and not sinners from among the Gentiles; 16 nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified. |
|
|
|
Post by civic on Oct 9, 2022 5:05:02 GMT -8
duplicate post erased
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2022 7:09:30 GMT -8
I have a question for the dozen or so posters in this thread (and any who participate hereafter). I ask this question because correctly understanding the answer to this question leads to a correct understanding of the law as a Christian and unity among the posters in the thread. Likewise, not correctly understanding the answer to the question invariably leads to an incorrect understanding of the law as a Christian and that will, in turn, lead to division among those in the thread. The question can, and should, be answered in one to three words. (" X" or " X and Y"). The responses doing so will be much appreciated. Let me encourage everyone to read the relevant epistolary texts (Romans 3; Galatians 2-5; James 1) before answering because the answer to the above question is plainly stated. It is not a matter of interpretation. What is the stated context of Paul's (and James') commentary on the law? . Galatians 3:1-14 Galatians 3:21-27 Romans 3:19-20 Galatians 2:15-17 I can read scripture. Everyone here can read scripture. I specifically asked, " What is the stated context of Paul's (and James') commentary on the law?" and explicitly sttated the answer could be sated in one to three words. Aside from quoting scriptures we can all read, can you post the stated context of Paul's (and James') commentary on the law in one to three words? The words are found in the scriptures. What is the stated context of Paul's (and James') commentary on the law?One to three words, please. |
|
